On this page
- The short answer
- Pricing
- The assessment
- What your applicants experience
- What comes back after each interview
- Integrations and workflow
- Scoring and data
- Which should you choose?
- Moving from Mettl
Reference
The short answer
Mercer | Mettl covers several different assessment jobs. Its catalog includes technical tests, live coding tools, psychometric instruments and remote examination proctoring. The value of that breadth depends on which instrument and delivery method your hiring process actually needs[6].
Flowmingo starts with spoken evidence from the applicant. The AI asks the configured interview questions, follows up and returns a recording, transcript and criterion-based evaluation. Recruiters can add Technical Tests for executable coding work, then review the candidate’s evidence within the hiring pipeline.
Choose an assessment method before choosing a vendor. A live pair-programming round, a psychometric questionnaire and an asynchronous AI interview do not measure the same thing. Mettl may be relevant for a specific instrument or supervised assessment program. Flowmingo is a direct option when the immediate need is unlimited AI interviewing and a practical review workflow.
2 more differences worth knowing
Coding is available on both sides
Mettl offers coding assessments and live coding interviews. Flowmingo offers Technical Tests with executable questions. Compare the actual task, runtime and review evidence instead of using a coding checkbox[2,3].
See the detailThe assessment instrument matters
A psychometric test has a different purpose from an AI interview scored against job requirements. Ask for evidence supporting the particular instrument and use case[4].
See the detail
Pricing: what each one costs you
Request a quote for the exact battery and delivery conditions.
Mettl’s public pricing asks buyers to choose products and request personalized pricing. A price taken from an unrelated test package cannot establish the cost of a complete hiring workflow[1].
| What | Mettl | |
|---|---|---|
| Published employer price | Custom quote[1] | Free $0; Starter US$49/month; Growth US$99/month. AI interviews stay unlimited |
| Purchase scope | Selected assessment products and customization[1] | Unlimited AI interviews on Free; paid options separately |
| Trial | Free-trial invitation on coding product page; confirm scope[2] | Ongoing Free AI interviewing |
| Live coding | Include live-interview tool requirements[3] | Technical Tests assessed separately from spoken interview |
| Proctoring | Specify AI, human or secure-browser configuration[5] | Review requirements for the selected Flowmingo assessment |
| Report and video access | Include retention, sharing and exports in the quote | Standard links on Free; paid downloads and longer retention |
Build one comparable hiring path. Suppose applicants complete a first interview, a coding exercise and a later technical discussion. List which product serves each stage, how many applicants reach it and what evidence returns. Request a quote for that sequence rather than comparing a single test price with a complete interviewing process.
For a supervised assessment, also specify who supplies the proctor, what happens when a session is interrupted and whether an additional attempt is chargeable. For a psychometric battery, include any interpretation or implementation support the team needs. Those are meaningful parts of the purchase even when they are not shown as a separate button on the product page.
Flowmingo’s interview volume is unlimited, but storage and exports have plan rules. Free retains the latest 300 videos for 30 days and keeps results, scores and transcripts. A team that needs downloadable files or longer video access should include a paid plan. Do not turn that retention limit into an interview-volume limit.
Flowmingo's plans: Free is $0 with unlimited AI interviews. Starter ($49 a month) and Growth ($99 a month) add your brand on what you share, downloads, longer assessments and longer-kept interview videos. See pricing.
How these numbers were worked out
- Pricing checked 4 October 2026.
- No Mettl assessment price, annual minimum or total contract is estimated.
- Trial calls to action are not treated as an ongoing free employer plan.
- Compare like-for-like stages, including required proctoring, reporting and implementation scope.
The assessment: spoken evidence, executable work or a live technical discussion
Mettl’s coding products distinguish automated tests from a live environment in which an interviewer watches the candidate work. Flowmingo’s AI interview and Technical Tests also serve different assessment purposes[2,3].

| What | Mettl | |
|---|---|---|
| Spoken first interview | Confirm the exact interview product and whether a person attends | The AI asks aloud and follows up; the applicant records video answers in their own time |
| Coding evaluation | Prebuilt test cases and automated grading[2] | Executable coding questions and sandbox verification in Technical Tests |
| Live technical round | Pair programming, whiteboard and notepad[3] | Evaluate the team’s later technical discussion separately |
| Question preparation | Library and role-specific assessment options[2] | 1-30 questions drafted from the job description; edit the questions and criteria before inviting |
| Evidence interpretation | Review the scoring method for the selected instrument | 0-10 per criterion with a written reason; overall score uses the importance you set |
| Interview duration | Depends on the purchased assessment and round | Set the whole interview up to 60 minutes, depending on your plan |
Choose a task that reflects the role. For a backend engineer, a small debugging exercise may reveal more relevant evidence than an unrelated algorithm puzzle. Examine which constraints the candidate must handle, how the test cases distinguish a partial solution and whether the report preserves their approach. A larger question library does not guarantee that the selected question is appropriate.
For a role where judgment and communication matter, use the interview to ask how the applicant handled a real situation and why they chose that action. Use a coding or knowledge test for evidence that needs execution or a defined answer. Combining the methods can be useful; averaging unrelated scores without a clear interpretation is not.
What your applicants experience
The candidate’s preparation depends on the selected assessment. A short browser interview and a supervised coding examination should not arrive under the same vague invitation.
Test the complete candidate setup before a hiring campaign. Check the device requirements, permissions, allowed resources and support path. If a browser restriction blocks an accessibility tool or a legitimate work environment, the team needs a clear alternative. A failed setup should not silently become a low ability score. Keep spoken interview language, interface translation and programming language as separate requirements.
| What | Mettl | |
|---|---|---|
| Interview entry | Explain whether the activity is a test or scheduled live round | Invitation to an asynchronous AI interview |
| Delivery | Confirm channels for the purchased assessment | Email invitations and reminders; eligible paid WhatsApp invitations with credits |
| Device controls | Secure Browser supports Windows and Mac; configuration matters[5] | A phone or laptop browser, with a camera and microphone check before the interview |
| Monitoring | AI, human and record-and-review options described[5] | Explain the monitoring relevant to the selected assessment |
| Language | Confirm the specific test language and validation population | 60+ spoken interview languages; applicants choose from the languages you allow |

What comes back after each interview
The report must explain the evidence produced by the chosen method. Mettl’s coding tools describe test-based evaluation and code playback, while Flowmingo’s interview report links the role’s requirements to spoken evidence[2,3].
| What | Mettl | |
|---|---|---|
| Coding report | Automated test results and technical analytics[2] | Technical Test results alongside other candidate assessments |
| Live coding review | Code playback and earlier screening data[3] | Keep the relevant technical evidence with the hiring decision |
| Spoken interview | Confirm recording and transcript for the selected module | Video recording and transcript, with the answer available alongside its evaluation |
| Criterion evaluation | Instrument-specific scoring; inspect the sample report | 0-10 per criterion with a written reason; overall score uses the importance you set |
| Human decision | Reviewer interprets the selected assessment | Recruiters review the evidence and decide who moves forward |


Overall scoreAsk reviewers to explain a borderline result. A candidate may solve the main coding problem but miss an edge case, or give a strong example without addressing one requirement. A useful report makes that distinction visible. For psychometric output, ask what the scale measures, which comparison group applies and what inference the assessment provider considers appropriate. Do not treat a percentile from one instrument as equivalent to an interview rating.
Integrations and workflow
| What | Mettl | |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment catalog | Hiring, development and examination products[6] | AI interviewing, Technical Tests and supporting hiring assessments |
| Hiring record | Confirm candidate-record and ATS handoff for the selected products | Built-in hiring stages, applicant records, notes and team ratings on every plan |
| Developer connection | Specify the required integration and result events | REST API, webhooks and MCP for custom integrations on every plan |
| Team access | Confirm administrator, interviewer and reviewer permissions | Unlimited team members, with Owner, Admin and Member roles |
| Branded sharing | Confirm product and contract-specific presentation options | Paid report branding and career-page customization |
A broad suite still needs a clear handoff. Identify which system invites the applicant, which holds the results and which records the final decision. Confirm that the report belongs to the correct person and role, and that a reviewer can access only the evidence they need. A successful test launch does not prove that downstream ATS updates or access removal work.

Scoring, oversight and candidate data
Check evidence for the instrument and the monitoring configuration
Mettl describes assessments developed by psychologists, psychometricians and data scientists, as well as AI and human proctoring. Evaluate those claims for the exact product and intended candidate population[4,5].
Match the claim to the evidence. A security certification concerns a defined control scope; it does not establish that a hiring score predicts performance. A proctoring flag identifies an event to review; it is not automatically proof of misconduct. A psychometric instrument needs an interpretation appropriate to its validation, language and population. Keep each of those questions separate during procurement.
| What | Mettl | |
|---|---|---|
| Psychometric basis | Request the selected instrument’s validity and reliability evidence[4] | AI interview rates the job requirements supplied by the team |
| Proctoring | AI flags, human invigilation and secure-browser options[5] | Inspect relevant assessment evidence before drawing conclusions |
| Security documentation | Published standards; request current evidence and scope[1] | Request current certification evidence. A published DPA is a data contract, not a certification |
| Data terms | Confirm hosting, retention and deletion for the contract | Published Data Processing Agreement and Privacy Policy; confirm retention and deletion requirements |
Which should you choose?
| If you are | Pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| You need unlimited AI interviews without a contract | Flowmingo | Free provides ongoing AI interviewing and team access. |
| You are procuring a particular psychometric battery | Mettl | Evaluate Mettl’s relevant instrument and supporting validation materials[4]. |
| You need executable coding questions | Either | Both support coding assessment; compare the task and review evidence. |
| You need live pair programming with a whiteboard | Mettl | Mettl documents that specific live-interview environment[3]. |
| You need a supervised examination program | Mettl | Evaluate its human proctoring and secure-browser package[5]. |
| Your priority is spoken first-screen evidence | Flowmingo | The AI interviewer returns a recording, transcript and weighted evaluation. |
| You need a specific ATS handoff | Either | Verify the selected integration and permissions with a test candidate. |
Moving from Mettl: test one role first
Evaluate one hiring stage before replacing an assessment program.
- Define the evidence neededSeparate spoken examples, executed work, psychometric measures and live technical discussion.
- Select the actual productRequest the relevant Mettl module or configure Flowmingo’s interview and Technical Test.
- Review a borderline candidateInspect the source evidence and the meaning of the score, not only the ranking.
- Verify the complete processTest candidate setup, reviewer access, result transfer, retention and total contracted scope.
Pilot it on 1 role this week. Unlimited AI interviews in 60+ languages, for $0.
Start Hiring FreeThe full comparison, point by point
For the procurement checklist: all 31 points, with a source on each. Open a group.
Price and plan limits6 points
| What | Mettl | |
|---|---|---|
| Published employer price | Custom quote[1] | Free $0; Starter US$49/month; Growth US$99/month. AI interviews stay unlimited |
| Purchase scope | Selected assessment products and customization[1] | Unlimited AI interviews on Free; paid options separately |
| Trial | Free-trial invitation on coding product page; confirm scope[2] | Ongoing Free AI interviewing |
| Live coding | Include live-interview tool requirements[3] | Technical Tests assessed separately from spoken interview |
| Proctoring | Specify AI, human or secure-browser configuration[5] | Review requirements for the selected Flowmingo assessment |
| Report and video access | Include retention, sharing and exports in the quote | Standard links on Free; paid downloads and longer retention |
The interview6 points
| What | Mettl | |
|---|---|---|
| Spoken first interview | Confirm the exact interview product and whether a person attends | The AI asks aloud and follows up; the applicant records video answers in their own time |
| Coding evaluation | Prebuilt test cases and automated grading[2] | Executable coding questions and sandbox verification in Technical Tests |
| Live technical round | Pair programming, whiteboard and notepad[3] | Evaluate the team’s later technical discussion separately |
| Question preparation | Library and role-specific assessment options[2] | 1-30 questions drafted from the job description; edit the questions and criteria before inviting |
| Evidence interpretation | Review the scoring method for the selected instrument | 0-10 per criterion with a written reason; overall score uses the importance you set |
| Interview duration | Depends on the purchased assessment and round | Set the whole interview up to 60 minutes, depending on your plan |
Candidate experience5 points
| What | Mettl | |
|---|---|---|
| Interview entry | Explain whether the activity is a test or scheduled live round | Invitation to an asynchronous AI interview |
| Delivery | Confirm channels for the purchased assessment | Email invitations and reminders; eligible paid WhatsApp invitations with credits |
| Device controls | Secure Browser supports Windows and Mac; configuration matters[5] | A phone or laptop browser, with a camera and microphone check before the interview |
| Monitoring | AI, human and record-and-review options described[5] | Explain the monitoring relevant to the selected assessment |
| Language | Confirm the specific test language and validation population | 60+ spoken interview languages; applicants choose from the languages you allow |
Reports and evaluation5 points
| What | Mettl | |
|---|---|---|
| Coding report | Automated test results and technical analytics[2] | Technical Test results alongside other candidate assessments |
| Live coding review | Code playback and earlier screening data[3] | Keep the relevant technical evidence with the hiring decision |
| Spoken interview | Confirm recording and transcript for the selected module | Video recording and transcript, with the answer available alongside its evaluation |
| Criterion evaluation | Instrument-specific scoring; inspect the sample report | 0-10 per criterion with a written reason; overall score uses the importance you set |
| Human decision | Reviewer interprets the selected assessment | Recruiters review the evidence and decide who moves forward |
Integrations and team5 points
| What | Mettl | |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment catalog | Hiring, development and examination products[6] | AI interviewing, Technical Tests and supporting hiring assessments |
| Hiring record | Confirm candidate-record and ATS handoff for the selected products | Built-in hiring stages, applicant records, notes and team ratings on every plan |
| Developer connection | Specify the required integration and result events | REST API, webhooks and MCP for custom integrations on every plan |
| Team access | Confirm administrator, interviewer and reviewer permissions | Unlimited team members, with Owner, Admin and Member roles |
| Branded sharing | Confirm product and contract-specific presentation options | Paid report branding and career-page customization |
Oversight and candidate data4 points
| What | Mettl | |
|---|---|---|
| Psychometric basis | Request the selected instrument’s validity and reliability evidence[4] | AI interview rates the job requirements supplied by the team |
| Proctoring | AI flags, human invigilation and secure-browser options[5] | Inspect relevant assessment evidence before drawing conclusions |
| Security documentation | Published standards; request current evidence and scope[1] | Request current certification evidence. A published DPA is a data contract, not a certification |
| Data terms | Confirm hosting, retention and deletion for the contract | Published Data Processing Agreement and Privacy Policy; confirm retention and deletion requirements |
Questions buyers ask
Is Mercer | Mettl the same kind of product as an AI interviewer?
Its catalog is broader: coding, psychometric, aptitude and proctoring products serve different purposes. Confirm the particular interview or assessment module you are evaluating[6].
Does Flowmingo offer coding assessments?
Yes. Technical Tests provide executable coding questions. Compare the specific language runtime, task and review evidence instead of assuming only Mettl offers coding.
Does Mettl publish a standard price?
The current pricing page requests a personalized quote for chosen products. No universal per-candidate rate is published there[1].
Can an AI interview replace a psychometric test?
They collect and interpret different evidence. Decide which job-related question the assessment must answer, then evaluate the method and its supporting evidence.
Sources and method
This comparison was updated on 4 Oct 2026. Competitor claims link to Mettl's own pages or a named third party; ratings carry their own checked dates. Flowmingo facts come from our pricing, the AI Interviewer page, a sample report, our Data Processing Agreement and our Privacy Policy. Spotted something out of date? Tell us below and we fix it.
All 6 sources
- 1 Mercer | Mettl: personalized product pricing. mettl.com
- 2 Mercer | Mettl: coding assessments and evaluation. mettl.com
- 3 Mercer | Mettl: live coding interviews and pair programming. mettl.com
- 4 Mercer | Mettl: psychometric assessment methodology. mettl.com
- 5 Mercer | Mettl: AI, human and secure-browser proctoring. mettl.com
- 6 Mercer | Mettl: current assessment product scope. mettl.com
What changed, and when
- Added a product-specific comparison of interviews, coding, psychometric testing, proctoring and custom pricing.